I replied to the following: ↷

Compromise with people who commit and carry out hideous acts requires a minimal number of future casualties that you have to “accept”. I think “accepting” that is also excusing the behavior. It'd be more consistent to not concede altogether.
↑ byhttps://jacky.wtf • posted • archived copy • current

It's easy - so much easier - to compromise. There are times when it is quite literally out of your current dimensional ability to concede. Like if you're part of the 99%, you cannot solve world hunger. But there are things on a small scale that we can do. We can refuse to let up, talk about active solutions, donate to causes and overall build community to help people discover a place/resource to find/get help should the situation ever arise for it.

Posted with Quill at in Everything

Shared to Twitter, @jalcine@todon.eu

Engagement is powered by Webmentions — a premier standard of the Web to let other sites know you've mentioned them. Learn how to reply from your own site. or from a supported silo Aaron has an interactive post about this. If you've mentioned this URL via another one, use the form below to submit it.

If you don't currently own your replies, then you can click below to do so.

I currently aim to own my comments and plan to eventually show those I've received once I finish Lighthouse.