I replied to the following: ↷

Holding my breath, but this is a decent first step. https://www.ftc.gov/business-guidance/blog/2023/03/chatbots-deepfakes-voice-clones-ai-deception-sale. Noticed by https://dair-community.social/@emilymbender/110061676148297098. If this is something that's actionable, Microsoft would have been issued some sort of reprimand (or at least, the CEO of OpenAI). But again, nothing.

↑ byhttps://jacky.wtf • posted • archived copy • current

I do think that the same level of deregulation that Nixon and Reagan pushed for allowed for the heavy proliferation of abusive services (yes, generative AI is abusive since it doesn't have a concept of consent and one of the prevailing issues of networked services and vulnerable people is consent) like big pharma, telecommunications and food was the natural result of AI like this.

Posted with Quill at in Everything

Shared to Twitter, @jalcine@todon.eu

Engagement is powered by Webmentions — a premier standard of the Web to let other sites know you've mentioned them. Learn how to reply from your own site. or from a supported silo Aaron has an interactive post about this. If you've mentioned this URL via another one, use the form below to submit it.

If you don't currently own your replies, then you can click below to do so.

I currently aim to own my comments and plan to eventually show those I've received once I finish Lighthouse.