Karl Auerbach (@karlauerbach@sfba.social)

@jalcine@todon.eu What a terribly drafted bill!(I don't disagree with the sentiment, but the definitions are dangerously vague and open ended.)It is so badly drafted that it could sweep in many churches and even countries (such as Israel).
bySFBA.social archived copycurrent

It would definitely give groups like the NRA and ADL a trip (once more people use something like this to invoke a tax-backed "hunt" for terrorists).

It takes me "so long" to read things. I'm only halfway through Supa Dupa Skies by Logic(s) whereas I've finished two copies of In These Times. In the case of Supa Dupa Skies, the essay, Origin Stories, was what I first opened up to and blew my mind. That led me to starting Accounting for Slavery, a book that I still haven't finished but from reading the references gives me very little hope for the field of management (given its shared history with the industry/system of policing, IMO). I like "jumping around" like this because it's within a domain I have a lot of interest in and keeps things interested. Note taking has helped me context-switch and as well as — and I only started this about three years ago — writing about what you've read from each chapter. Might be more obvious to college heads but this has improved both my recall but also my ability to pick up where I left off at. I still want to make some of my notes semi-public but that's for the future.

Whyyyyyy? https://www.govtrack.us/congress/bills/118/hr6408

byVectorized form of Jackyhttps://jacky.wtf • posted archived copycurrent

The most notable point of this bill is this phrase " a terrorist or terrorist-supporting organization within the prior three years". This would pull this status from organizations that support political prisoners if the state considers them to be a terrorist. Or anyone who's been protesting the war on Palestine.

The bodycam era was the best thing to happen to the news because it removed the ability of citizens to report things; it returned the authority of the narrative back to the state. On par with corporate security footage being used over civilian or independent reports.

https://www.blackagendareport.com/rise-militarized-policing-response-black-dissent put me onto how much COINTELPRO was so hell-bent on making sure its internal colony of Africans could not self-actualize in a meaningful way.

By 1970 fully 70% of the FBI COINTELPRO operations were aimed at Black organizations, from the non-violent SCLC led by Dr. King to SNCC, CORE, and the Black Panther Party (BPP). Ultimately, the majority of the 70% of COINTELPRO operations that focused on Black groups and Black leaders collectively were directed exclusively at the BPP. Why was this?

I'm ringing a bell that we all heard before by now but this closing line is one to close the day on:

The confirmed range for the size of these “Cop City” projects is as low as a 3,500 square foot structure on 3 acres to a 366,000 square foot village on 146 acres. The largest being planned did not include details on the actual facility, but the proposed site is a whopping 800 acres. Historically, a basic prerequisite for autocratic Fascist rule is a national militarized police force, backed by an all-pervasive civilian police intelligence apparatus with a singular national Database. It hasn’t been a long time coming but corporate America and its political power structure have fashioned a police state under cover of a spurious “electoral college” democracy and chauvinistic white nationalism. It’s called Democratic Fascism.

First time in a while I've seen a hosting service explictly mention Publii, via https://pages.casa/. I think https://getpublii.com/ has the right idea and is missing a few parts. Having it the act of hosting something — or even producing Web content be similar to document processing (or vector graphic creation) is where I feel we need to be moving the open Web. Making it work with ActivityPub seems doable too with more demonstration of static-site ActivityPub solutions (or one even going as far as adding a thin layer for compatible static sites to make it operate like an AP site).

mhoye (@mhoye@mastodon.social)

@jalcine@todon.eu I don’t think that it was purely a tech thing - the Sears Catalog was discontinued in 1993, and Amazon was founded in 1994. They were born a catalog company, but their executives of the 80s and 90s tried to turn them into a mediocre financial services company, failed at that, and to the end were absolutely convinced, at the dawn of the internet, that people really wanted to go into their stores.
byMastodon archived copycurrent

Ahhh I see what you're saying! Yeah, talk about pulling your own plug

mhoye (@mhoye@mastodon.social)

@jalcine@todon.eu I don’t think that it was purely a tech thing - the Sears Catalog was discontinued in 1993, and Amazon was founded in 1994. They were born a catalog company, but their executives of the 80s and 90s tried to turn them into a mediocre financial services company, failed at that, and to the end were absolutely convinced, at the dawn of the internet, that people really wanted to go into their stores.
byMastodon archived copycurrent

mhoye (@mhoye@mastodon.social)

@jalcine@todon.eu I don’t think that it was purely a tech thing - the Sears Catalog was discontinued in 1993, and Amazon was founded in 1994. They were born a catalog company, but their executives of the 80s and 90s tried to turn them into a mediocre financial services company, failed at that, and to the end were absolutely convinced, at the dawn of the internet, that people really wanted to go into their stores.
byMastodon archived copycurrent

It was moreso on the evolution of commerce (not so much tech as in like VC-backed SVB kinda tech). This quote is more of the "tech" I'm thinking of (so more like VISA and Mastercard):

AM: This is another one of those situations where I think it’s useful to look back at what was actually happening at the time and how people thought about things at the time. Because the delivery regime that we have is convenient in a lot of ways for people that can afford to interface with it. It’s really easy to get used to it, especially since other options for more traditional types of commerce, in a lot of places have dwindled, especially in places with poorer populations. In the late 90s when Amazon was founded and you get a lot of other dot-com startups that were trying to figure out what this model would be to sell things online. It was met by a population that was largely pretty skeptical of having to buy something on the internet. It was a novel technology; it seemed like the Wild West. It seemed like buying something online was probably a great way to get your credit card stolen. There wasn’t a lot of trust.